by Jim Kouri, CPP
Identity theft and identity fraud are terms used to refer to types of crime in which someone wrongfully obtains and uses another individual’s personal data in a way that involves fraud or deception, typically for economic gain.
Unlike fingerprints, which are unique to an individual and cannot be given to someone else for their use, personal data — especially Social Security numbers, bank account or credit card numbers, telephone calling card numbers, and other valuable identifying data — can be used by someone to personally profit at the victim’s expense.
Unauthorized persons take funds out of others’ bank or financial accounts or take over their identities altogether, running up debts and committing crimes while using the victims’ names. A victim’s losses may include not only out-of-pocket financial losses, but additional costs associated with trying to restore his reputation in the community and correcting erroneous information about his financial or personal status.
Â
The phenomenon of iJacking — a new term created by a company named Intersections Inc. to encompass the far reaching financially and emotionally devastating impact of having thieves assume your identity or use your Social Security number to commit fraud — is found to be an alarming problem with clear geographic and socioeconomic divides for cities at risk. With identity theft complaints to the Federal Trade Commission topping 250,000 last year, Sperling’s Best Places finds the San Francisco Bay Area to be the most at risk area for iJacking
In fact nine of the top ten cities most at risk for iJacking are on the West Coast, while the majority of the safest cities fall to the East.
 Â
 - San Francisco, Seattle, Denver, San Jose, San Diego, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas, Sacramento and Phoenix are all among the top ten most at risk cities.
  Â
- Eastern cities like Pittsburgh, Buffalo, New Orleans, Providence, Rochester and Virginia Beach are among the safest.
  Â
The study also finds a correlation between transaction rates and affluence, showing that those with the most to lose are also at the most risk for losing it.
  Â
   - San Jose, San Francisco and Washington DC all rank in the top ten in transaction rates and also have the highest number of households making over $250,000.
  Â
   - On the other hand, New Orleans, Oklahoma City and San Antonio are among  the lowest cities in transaction rates and also have the lowest number of households making over $250,000.
  Â
A combination of high ATM use, Internet use and purchasing habits make the West Coast the most dangerous region for iJacking. San Francisco ranks in the top percentile for technology risk factors, which include frequency of online banking, purchasing and overall time spent online.
San Jose ranks in the 98th percentile and Denver in the 81st percentile. Conversely, Birmingham (ranked 47th out of 50) ranks in the bottom percentile, while Pittsburgh and San Antonio (ranked 50th and 35th) rank in the second and fourth percentile respectively.
  Â
Meanwhile, larger markets like Los Angeles and Dallas Fort Worth are at a higher overall risk, ranking number 13th and 14th respectively. While larger markets in the East, including New York and Philadelphia, which rank 29th and 30th, are markedly safer.
  Â
Sperling’s Best Places, which ranks cities based on a number of factors, conducted a study of the 50 largest metropolitan areas in the United States and gauged the cities at the highest and lowest risk for identity theft or iJacking.
   TEN MOST RISKY CITIES
   1) San Francisco
   2) Seattle
   3) Denver
   4) San Jose
   5) San Diego
   6) Atlanta
   7) Salt Lake City
  Â
Las Vegas
   9) Sacramento
   10) Phoenix
   TEN LEAST RISKY CITIES
   41) Rochester
   42) Providence
   43) Cincinnati
   44) Cleveland
   45) Virginia Beach
   46) New Orleans
   47) Birmingham
   48) Louisville
   49) Buffalo
   50) Pittsburgh
  Â
“Nearly every day, there are new reports of sensitive personal information being lost or stolen,” said Bert Sperling, president of Sperling’s Best Places. “What we found in our research is an alarming number of risk factors, from ATM to credit card use, that put nearly
everyone at risk for iJacking.”
  Â
Frequent ATM use, dining out and credit card use all contribute to a higher overall risk for iJacking. Cities like Boston, San Francisco, Sacramento and Seattle have higher transaction rates than lower risk cities like Memphis, Buffalo and New Orleans.
  Â
“No matter where your city falls on this study, one thing is abundantly clear, iJacking is a very real danger and consumers need to take immediate action to protect themselves,” said Michael Stanfield, chairman and CEO of Intersections Inc.
“Unlike traditional crimes where prevention can be achieved through simple behavioral changes, like parking a car in the garage to avoid carjacking, consumers are challenged to keep vigilant watch over all aspects of their identity.”
  Â
Identity Thieves Have Many Ways to Commit Identity Fraud
  Â
iJacking is a new breed of crime with multiple risk factors. For this study alone, Sperling’s Best Places analyzed over 80 contributing risk factors ranging from Internet and credit card use to household income and methamphetamine rates.
  Â
Even in cities ranking lower on the riskiest cities list, there are dangers:
  Â
   - Providence ranks 30th overall and Rochester 33rd overall, but they are in the 96th and 92nd percentiles respectively in at risk behavior like harboring debt and having large numbers of financial accounts.
   - San Antonio is among the safest cities for iJacking, yet still ranks in the 47th percentile in lifestyle risk factors including crime,  methamphetamine and other factors.
  Â
Complete Rankings
   1) San Francisco
   2) Seattle
   3) Denver
   4) San Jose
   5) San Diego
   6) Atlanta
   7) Salt Lake City
   8) Las Vegas
   9) Sacramento
   10) Phoenix
   11) Portland
   12) Washington
   13) Dallas-Fort Worth
   14) Riverside
   15) Los Angeles
   16) Chicago
   17) Minneapolis-St. Paul
   18) Austin
   19) Charlotte
   20) Orlando
   21) Indianapolis
   22) Houston
   23) Miami
   24) Detroit
   25) Baltimore
   26) Boston
   27) Kansas City
   28) Hartford
   29) New York
   30) Philadelphia
   31) Columbus
   32) Tampa
   33) Oklahoma City
   34) St. Louis
   35) San Antonio
   36) Milwaukee
   37) Jacksonville
   38) Richmond
   39) Memphis
   40) Nashville
   41) Rochester
   42) Providence
   43) Cincinnati
   44) Cleveland
   45) Virginia Beach
   46) New Orleans
   47) Birmingham
   48) Louisville
   49) Buffalo
   50) Pittsburgh
http://www.stopijacking.com
Â
http://www.bestplaces.net
http://www.intersections.com.
 Â
(Special thanks to Jim Gordon, Asst. Executive Director of Information & Publications of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, for providing valuable information for this column.)
Jim Kouri, CPP is currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police and he’s a staff writer for the New Media Alliance (thenma.org). He’s former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed “Crack City” by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of security for several major organizations. He’s also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country.  Kouri writes for many police and security magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and others. He’s a news writer for TheConservativeVoice.Com. He’s also a columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he’s syndicated by AXcessNews.Com.  He’s appeared as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, Fox News, etc. His book Assume The Position is available at Amazon.Com. Kouri’s own website is located at http://jimkouri.us
  Â
Rate this post:


Stumble It!











HACKDOT » 2006 » July » 12 said,
[...] Definitely not something you want to think about. However, it never hurts to know what you’re up against right? Here are the Top 10 Cities to Have Your Identity Stolen: [...]
July 12, 2006 at 9:55 am
Security Pitstop v3.0 » Top 10 US Cities for Identify Theft - Working Towards Better Privacy and Security Online said,
[...] read more | digg story [...]
July 12, 2006 at 1:57 pm
Des Grenouilles dans la Vallée » Blog Archive » Vol d’identité : SF et San José dans les villes à haut risque said,
[...] Le blogueur Jim Kouri, ancien flic spécialiste des questions légales pour le plutôt conservateur Men’s News Daily, vient de publier un billet très intéressant sur les villes américaines où le vol d’identité est le plus courant. Aux États-Unis, ce type de crime est très courant. En s’appropriant les informations personnelles d’une personne, principalement leur numéro unique de Social Security, les escrocs peuvent ouvrir des comptes bancaires ou même faire des emprunts au nom de leur victime, et disparaître avec l’argent récolté ou les achats effectués avec une carte bancaire obtenue frauduleusement. Il n’y a en effet pas de système de pièce d’identité nationale aux États-Unis, et un simple permis de conduire délivré par un État suffit généralement pour prouver son identité. En s’appropriant le nom et les informations personnelles d’une victime, les escrocs peuvent même souvent obtenir un vrai-faux permis leur permettant d’opérer encore plus facilement. La région de la Baie figure parmi les agglomérations offrant les plus hauts salaires du pays. Il n’est donc pas surprenant que San Francisco soit numéro un sur la liste des villes où le risque de vol d’identité est le plus élevé. San José est à la quatrième place, derrière Seattle et Denver. Un autre facteur cité contribuant à l’augmentation des risques est l’utilisation courante de cartes à débit immédiat (debit cards) dans des guichets automatique et la gestion de finances personnelles en ligne, qui nécessitent des précautions particulières. [...]
July 12, 2006 at 4:54 pm
Remix Resource » Blog Archive » Top 10 US Cities for Identify Theft said,
[...] The 10 US cities you are likely to be ijacked in, as well as the 10 safest cities.read more | digg story [...]
July 13, 2006 at 12:36 am
Midnight Research Labs - San Francisco is highest risk city for stolen identity said,
[...] According to this report on The top 10 Cities to Have Your Identity Stolen (or as an attempted coined term[*] by Intersections, Inc, “iJacking“), San Francisco is number one. I should know, being an “iJacking” victim myself. TEN MOST RISKY CITIES 1) San Francisco 2) Seattle 3) Denver 4) San Jose 5) San Diego 6) Atlanta 7) Salt Lake City Las Vegas 9) Sacramento 10) Phoenix [...]
July 14, 2006 at 1:14 am
EveryDigg » Blog Archive » Top 10 US Cities for Identify Theft said,
[...] The 10 US cities you are likely to be ijacked in, as well as the 10 safest cities.read more | digg story [...]
July 15, 2006 at 4:37 am
Security » Top 10 US Cities for Identify Theft said,
[...] The 10 US cities you are likely to be ijacked in, as well as the 10 safest cities.read more | digg story [...]
September 1, 2006 at 8:00 am
» Top 10 US Cities for Identify Theft said,
[...] Page Summary: La région de la Baie figure parmi les agglomérations offrant les plus hauts salaires du pays. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service .read more | digg story [...]
October 27, 2006 at 12:15 am
speed links: voip security, GreatNews rss reader » Tips and Tricks to help you Master Your Computer said,
[...] VOIP phone data open to hacking ‘’WireShark, detects ‘voice over internet telephone calls, VoIP calls as they traverse a network, while another, Cain & Abel, records them [digital audio files] onto a hard drive, like an MP3.”[The Register] (solution: only purchase voip services which include strong encryption.) Top 10 Cities to Have Your Identity Stolen [found via Grumpy Hackers News Network] [...]
November 29, 2006 at 6:27 pm